Editing is part of the post-production of a film. Usually, it begins immediately after principal photography, when all the shots are recorded. The resulting footage is given to the editor and his team. By then, the director’s favorite takes would be circled in the camera report, a document also given to the editor to help him choose the best takes.
Editing is the art of assembling shots together to tell the visual story that is films. An editor is an important crew member in any film because he will give final shape to the project. They are called the third storytellers of a movie because, after the writer and director, the editor will construct (or de-construct) the narrative and truly define the story that audience will see.
Here is how Alfred Hitchcock explains some of the fundamentals of editing:
14535 Minutes of Footage
The job of an editor is much more than cutting and splicing footage. Walter Murch, the acclaimed Academy-Award winning editor and sound designer, whose body of work includes The English Patient (1996) and The Godfather (1972), opens his book In The Blink of An Eye by sharing his nightmarish experience while editing Apocalypse Now (1979).
In that picture, Murch faced an intimidating 95:1 ratio, meaning that for every minute of footage used in the final cut of the movie, there were 95 minutes not used.
Therefore, considering that Apocalypse Now’s theatrical release runs for 153 minutes, this means that the total footage was about 14535 minutes or 242 hours long! With that abnormally extravagant quantity of footage, Murch’s primary task of scrutinizing the footage to determine what worked and what didn’t was exponentially bigger. All editors go through this same process, but usually in a minor scale.
Each frame counts. The addition or removal of one frame may break or make a scene, by supporting or shattering the illusion intended. Therefore, editors work diligently to maintain the viewers’ suspension of disbelief.
Film editing determines pace and structure; it is a vital component to tell stories well.
What To Do To Be a Film Editor?
An editor has to have a good instinct for the length of each shot. As Tarantino mentioned, a few frames off can make a difference.
A great way to be aware of the length of shots is to watch a film you like on mute. Without sound and music to hide the cuts, you will get to experience each and every cut in a way you hadn’t before. And that’s important because cuts is what editors do. Also ask yourself why did the editor made a cut when he did it. What was he trying to convey or provoke? You will soon notice that a horror scene is cut differently from a humorous scene.
And remember: making the cut is easy. The hard part is knowing where the cut goes.
Because the editor is dealing with images and selecting the strongest footage, he also has to understand the basics of cinematography, specifically shot sizes. Reaction shots, for instance, can make a scene stand out like it’s nobody’s business. It’s your job to know where to insert them, and for how long.
Additionally, an editor has to be computer savvy and incredibly organized. The computer is your primary editing tool, and you will be playing with programs, codecs, file formats, and plugins to obtain your desired effects.
Two books I would recommend for you are: In the Blink of An Eye and Some Cutting Remarks. Both are from professional editors who have worked in the golden years of Hollywood. But Murch’s is my favorite because his essays on why cuts work and other topics are still relevant today.
The Cutting Edge
Here’s a great documentary about film editing. It’s over an hour long, but it’s quite insightful:
One of my favorite takeaways from the film is when Steven Spielberg explains the disagreements he had with his editor, Verna Fields, during the post-production of Jaws. While Spielberg wanted to extended shots with the shark, Fields was in favor of shortening anything with the beast. Ultimately, Spielberg agreed that Fields was right. The point here is how directors can have their minds clouded by working on the set. Spielberg had invested so much time and effort on the shark that he wanted more screen time for it. But for the editor, none of that matters. What matters is the end product because that’s what the audience will see.